In POLITIC; i think the perception of the general public are very important toward a certain leaders' image in our country.
Most of the time we judge a book by its cover and likewise to any human being and especially toward any politician. Unless one is proven guilty by another party outside our control-Like the case in Australia-Our friend here was caught of carrying Millions of RM/Aussie $ in the air port.That case was a true episode,no made up.We called it a red handed case.
Most of the time we judged a politician's wrong doing by media/Internet/word-of-mouth, etc.But do we have the concrete proof that he/she is the one actually doing it by himself or his agent? OR even planted by others.
A "perception" be in right or wrong is a very powerful tools being use by people in the Politic scene or used by people with ultimate motive to gain something or use it to destroy a person's Character,Well Being and so on.
If we are not careful; we could be sucked into believing something that are not true (on the Not- true event) and our perception might change totally towards the particular person.But if the events are true...Accents of TIME will testify the truth.People will unrest and the scenario Will favour the truth.The truth will always reveal by itself. We need TIME on that.
Do you really believe Lajib or "his" partners blown up the beautiful northern girl ( Sayang isn't it?) may be yes indeed his partner blown up the beauty.But it is the order from him? Yalah every one on the street said so...,even the Internet said so .....,the opposition said so...,even the one accused of blowing up the beauty(Sayang...betul,Why blow up a person!) also didn't mention exactly the order was from WHO!-They were just TAKING ORDERS from the TOP.OK the rest leave it to the COURT> set by the human court.
Do you believe Annta is a homosexual?! YES or MAY be not. YES i definitely think this way- YES and NO.Simple explanation;my perception on this man was what i read from the newspaper on the court judgment on that hot topic during that time.Yes from the news.Do you know him?I don't think so;I mean his private life. I still wonder why would he need to spurt on the bed of Tripoli Condo! haha No Condom mer?
But i know very sure our friend did suggest/impose
many things which did no favour the Chinese.Hereby enclosed an article from the Star:But do you think it is true?
PETALING JAYA: If Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim becomes Prime Minister, it will be an “unmitigated disaster” for Malaysia, a former Parti Keadilan Nasional (before they joined forces with Parti Rakyat Malaysia to become PKR) deputy-president said at a forum yesterday. The panel: (From left) Karim, Prof Syed Arabi, Dr Jayasooria, Wong, Dr Chandra and Sim discussing issues related to the general election at the forum at Menara Star in Petaling Jaya yesterday. Dr Chandra Muzaffar said that while the former deputy prime minister was a good speaker, he was not the sort of leader the country needed as he was now singing a different tune from when he was in the Government. Dr Chandra, who was the party's deputy-president for two-and-a-half years, said it was sad that many non-Malays in the country were taken in by Anwar’s multi-ethnic stand. “Today, he is portraying a totally different image and it is sad that quite a lot of non-Malays believe in this man. He is saying today that he wants to abolish the NEP (New Economic Policy) and that is music to their ears. “We are so communal that we cannot evaluate a person objectively,” said Dr Chandra, who was one of five speakers at The Star-Asian Centre for Media Studies Public Forum on the 2008 Malaysian General Election at Menara Star yesterday. Dr Chandra recalled that when Anwar was Education Minister, he had compelled schools to switch from using (the term) Bahasa Malaysia to Bahasa Melayu. Animated talk: Sim making a point at the forum yesterday.“Tunku Abdul Rahman wanted the use of Bahasa Malaysia to bring all the communities together and he (Anwar) forced Bahasa Melayu upon the school system. He was also responsible for putting non-Chinese educated administrators in Chinese schools.” Dr Chandra said that Anwar, in dealing with the Kampung Jawa clash between the Hindus and Indian Muslims in Penang, had said then that “he would make sure the temple bells would not ring in the country anymore”. Dr Chandra said the most important quality of a leader in a multi-ethnic country was honesty and when a leader spoke on sensitive ethnic issues, he must say the same thing to non-Malays as to the Malays. “You cannot play games because it is very dangerous,” he said. Dr Chandra also said that although Barisan Nasional was flawed, there was no other coalition in the country. Speaking of his “bitter experience”, he said the Opposition tried to form an alliance called Barisan Alternatif (BA), comprising PAS, DAP, Parti Keadilan Nasional and Parti Rakyat Malaysia, and he was tasked with forming a Just Malaysia manifesto for the 1999 elections. “BA did very well and it was one of the best performances by the Opposition but after the elections, PAS decided to pursue an ultraconservative Islam in Terengganu and this made it difficult for us. “DAP emphasised on an aggressive type of secularism which did not understand the role of religion in the country. A deep chasm was developed and the Opposition could not hold the middle ground and I don’t think they can for many, many years,” he said. On Sunday, former Gerakan president Datuk Seri Dr Lim Keng Yaik also lashed out at Anwar and described him as a “chameleon” who changed colour depending on the type of audience he was facing. Relating his experience with Anwar, Dr Lim said: “I was with him as a member of the Cabinet Committee on Education from 1987 to 1990 when Anwar was Education Minister and he gave us hell.” “One day, I even asked him if he wanted to remove Chinese schools. I told him if that was what he wanted, he should say so,” he said on efforts taken at that time by the Chinese community to remove Section 21 of the Education Act 1961, which gave powers to the minister to close down schools and to change national-type schools to national schools. “We argued for five years but he never moved,” Dr Lim said, adding that it was Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak who repealed the section when he became Education Minister.
A story on PERSONAL PERCEPTION
Different people have different perception. One man's meat could be another man's poison.
A couple bought a donkey from the market. On the way home, a boy commented, 'Very stupid. Why neither of them ride on the donkey? 'Upon hearing that, the husband let the wife ride on the donkey. He walked besides them.
Later, an old man saw it and commented, 'The husband is the head of family. How can the wife ride on the donkey while the husband is on foot?' Hearing this, the wife quickly got down and let the husband ride on the donkey.
Further on the way home, they met an old Lady. She commented, 'How can the man ride on the donkey but let the wife walk. He is no gentleman.'The husband thus quickly asked the wife to join him on the donkey.
Then, they met a young man. He commented, 'Poor donkey, how can you hold up the weight of two persons. They are cruel to you.' Hearing that, the husband and wife immediately climbed down from the donkey and carried it on their shoulders.It seems to be the only choice left.
Later, on a narrow bridge, the donkey was frightened and struggled. They lost their balance and fell into the river.
You can never have everyone praise you, nor will everyone condemn you. Never in the past, not at present, and never will be in the future.Thus, do not be too bothered by others words if our conscience is clear..
No comments:
Post a Comment